B: You most recent (and upcoming) work is entitled “Wonderland”. You’ve mentioned before that the inspiration for this came from the Chinese artist Cai Guo-Qiang’s installation “Head On”. Where did this name come from? How has this piece been “incorporated” into “Wonderland”?
AM: I think “Wonderland” is sort of coming from that installation, TS Elliot’s “The Wasteland,” and Alice in Wonderland. So there’s something very much like looking at a bleakness, a moment of depression and pause, a response to being involved in a traumatic time and taking a look at the debris (that’s what “The Wasteland” is for me), but then also a beautiful absurdist dreamscape (from Alice) and I wanted to take the real world ideas and put them in this absurdist world where I could play with my imagination and make characters, be inventive in it, and be responsive to this real world idea. I think this is also what CGQ did.
B: How do you choose the music that you use in your pieces? And more specifically, how did you choose the music for “Wonderland”?
AM: I’m listening to music all the time, and in the period of time I’m creating I’m really alert and sensitive to the things I’m hearing. I begin to filter more and more material that applies to the world I’m creating. It’s about being available to hearing the things during the day, and then I realize, “Oh yeah, this is part of ‘Wonderland’.” And after that what doesn’t fit gets cut.
AM: I’m listening to music all the time, and in the period of time I’m creating I’m really alert and sensitive to the things I’m hearing. I begin to filter more and more material that applies to the world I’m creating. It’s about being available to hearing the things during the day, and then I realize, “Oh yeah, this is part of ‘Wonderland’.” And after that what doesn’t fit gets cut.
B: In “Wonderland” you’re working with nearly twice the number of dancers as your last piece. What are the positives and negatives of this?
AM: I think there are inherently more structural and architectural choices to make with so many people, and I also have a sense of population or crowd. Like when you visit another country, you see how many people are there, or if its cities are empty. I really wanted a sense for the potential for chaos, a crowd, a pack. I needed a mass feeling. I also wanted to be able to expose the individual within the mass so I could make a contrast with this group. The individual dancer will always be important to me, especially the vulnerability of a person. Even if I have a lot of people onstage, I’ll always be interested in looking into each persona.
AM: I think there are inherently more structural and architectural choices to make with so many people, and I also have a sense of population or crowd. Like when you visit another country, you see how many people are there, or if its cities are empty. I really wanted a sense for the potential for chaos, a crowd, a pack. I needed a mass feeling. I also wanted to be able to expose the individual within the mass so I could make a contrast with this group. The individual dancer will always be important to me, especially the vulnerability of a person. Even if I have a lot of people onstage, I’ll always be interested in looking into each persona.
Interview of Andrea Miller by Base Interviews